The Chocolate War,
by Robert Cormier, is a book I am glad I read and a book I’m glad I did not
have to read for school. Let’s start with the basics:
• It’s short.
• It has swears and sexual language in it.
• It gets put on a lot of lists of the best YA novels ever
(this is why I read it).
• It gets banned by schools a lot (this is also a little bit
why I read it).
• It was written in the 1970s and is kind of dated, so it
can be hard to get really lost in it. I also found that the fact that it had
LOTS of character who were all boys made it easy to get confused and meant that
I had trouble getting lost in the book.
Like so many young adult classics, it’s a book about the
dangers of mob mentality, the importance of standing up for yourself, and the
ability to make an impact in an unfair world. I can’t say that I loved reading
it, if only because it felt dated and I wasn’t able to really get absorbed in
the book. It took a lot of energy to read. I think maybe stories set in high
school, where the norms of communication and friendship change so much over
time, have trouble aging well.
But even though I didn’t love reading it, I kind of loved
having read it. This book sticks with you. The lessons and themes are ones
we’ve seen again and again, but there are two things that make them
particularly meaningful and special in this book, and I think they are the two
things that make the book such a work of art.
Thing 1: The situation is so mundane. It is easy for an
author to make drama in a dramatic situation. In Lord of the Flies or 1984,
for example, there is an elaborately dramatic and abnormal setting in which the
reader can watch rebellion take place. In those settings, we can try to think
“What would I do?” and it’s easy to tell ourselves that we would take a stand,
we would be brave, we would make a difference. Those settings are separate from
our reality, and while we can relate to the emotions and connect them to the
real world, they are more like allegories than they are an example of day-to-day
life.
But unlike an island plane crash or a dystopian future
dictatorship, the setting for The
Chocolate War is so, well, boring. Everyone at Jerry Renault’s school is
asked to volunteer to sell chocolates for a school fundraiser, and he chooses
not to volunteer. That’s it. That’s his big rebellion.
And yet, it’s everything. The beauty of this book is that
you can truly see and understand how those tiny things mean so much and make
such a huge impact on yourself and the world around you. The kind of things
that seem like a big deal in high school and people tell you, “In ten years,
you won’t even remember this.” The kind of things that make you so deeply,
profoundly upset, and when you try to explain them to your parents they sound
like nothing so you end up saying, “you don’t understand” or “you had to be
there” and leaving it at that. Comier expertly shows how such a small action
can actually be giant, and that alone is worth reading the book.
Thing 2: The hero doesn’t win. Sure, The Chocolate War is far from the first novel where the good guy
doesn’t get his way. In fact, both the novels I mentioned before are good
examples of the good guy not getting his way – evil wins, and the good guy must
find a way to go on (or not) without getting to be a hero at all.
What’s rare, however, is for the good guy not to win in a
mundane setting. It would be easy and believable for some good to come from
Jerry’s protest. It wouldn’t feel cheesy or contrived – in a school setting,
the reader could conceive of a victory for right over wrong. When it doesn’t
come, we feel cheated in a way that we don’t in dramatic, fanciful settings.
When fanciful settings have a dark and unsatisfying ending, they still have a
kind of satisfaction in thinking, “I’m so glad real life isn’t like that.” The Chocolate War doesn’t deliver even
that satisfaction – it just ends, unresolved and unsettling, the bad guys
keeping the power. It feels bad, but small enough that it feels real, which is
what makes it unshakeable.


